We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads.

Research proposal in theology (them006), module description

Are you sure you want to YesNo Your message goes here No notes for slideTypeWhat type of data will I need to solve my problem? Will a purely literary study suffice, or will the study require an empirical component as well?Therefore, what type of study should I conduct? Therefore, will this study fall under practical theology, biblical studies, systematic theology, or another field?LogicHow will the logic of the study unfold? What are the steps you should follow in order to carry out the study? These often correspond to the key questions. In what order should they be carried out?Which model seems most appropriate for the study? Amongst the available research models/designs, which one seems most appropriate for your study?How do I need to customize it for my study? Will it fit your study perfectly ‘as is’, or will you need to customize it? If you need to customize it, explain how.

Dialogical: simply dialoguing with different authors’ ative: comparing different views, analysing their similarities and mentary: harmonising different theories or views by moulding them into a single, logically coherent mological: critiquing the philosophical foundation on which a theory or an argument is cal: arguing for or against a particular ical: breaking down a theory or a concept into its logical components or tic: putting together previously unrelated concepts or components to form a new entity (theory, model).

Textual criticism: reconstructing the original ical criticism: reconstructing the history of the text or the history in the l analysis: conducting word studies on key analysis: analysing the grammar of the rse analysis: analysing the discourse features of a whole criticism: analysing the sources an author ion criticism: exploring the theological message of a ural criticism: analysing the literary and semantic structure of a ical criticism: studying the literary artistry or rational argument of a text. Questionnaire: a series of written questions a researcher supplies to subjects, requesting their response.

Different kinds of questions solicit different types of data (e. , open or closed questions, quantitative or qualitative questions). Interview: a series of questions a researcher addresses personally to respondents.

As with questionnaires, different questions solicit different kinds of ation: in fieldwork, observation occurs when the researcher observes the subjects; in participant observation, a researcher systematically observes people while joining in their activities; in action research, a researcher observes without : a statistical study designed to provide a broad overview of a representative sample of a large group: a group discussion to solicit views about a focus study: the collection and presentation of detailed information about a particular participant, looking intensely at an individual or small participant pool, drawing conclusions only about that participant or group and only in that specific context.

The majority of entries should be from the last 10-15 years.

The dates are among the first things I look at when I skim the bibliography in a research proposal. I do no want to see the majority of entries from the 1960s.

Entries older than 25 years should be seminal works in the r works Postgraduate research degrees in Law · Programmes · Supervision areas · Current projects · Scholarships · Applications · Research proposal · Community. As part of the application for admission onto our MJur, MPhil and PhD programmes, you must prepare a research proposal outlining your proposed area of study..

06 research proposal - slideshare

Popular and devotional books (as opposed to academic sources) express the opinions and experiences of the author, but those views may not be well researched. The majority of works need to be academic vant works.

Students often fill up their bibliography by listing resources unrelated to the proposed research topic. If your thesis topic is ‘the work of the Holy Spirit in Luke’s gospel’, do not list Steven Covey’s Seven Habits of Highly Effective People in the bibliography.

When I see this, I immediately suspect the student has been too lazy to do a proper job and is listing works for the sake of reaching 20 l works. Try to include as many specialised books and articles as possible.

Although one-volume commentaries, Bible dictionaries or systematic theology textbooks may prove helpful during the study, specialised works are more valuable. For a thesis proposal on Psalm 3, Kselman’s article on the structure of Psalm 3 is more helpful than The New Bible Commentary.

THE PROPOSALWhat are the fundamentals of a quality research proposal? 3.

• A research proposal “is a document that outlines how youpropose to undertake your research studies” (Mouton2001:44). • The research proposal outlines what you will research andhow you will research it.

The ‘what’ part is called theproblem; the ‘how’ part we call the plan. • Once approved, the research proposal serves as a kind ofcontract between the student and the supervisor.

• ‘The greatest value of the research proposal is that it keepsthe research project on course’ (114).

– It dramatically reduces the amount of reading you will do. – It protects you against gathering unnecessary data.

• ‘In short, prepare a good proposal and your research will flow;prepare a poor one, and it will flop’ (115).

• Carelessness: students fail to edit their proposal withcare, so it contains many sloppy errors Candidates admitted to PhD study will not be bound by the proposal that accompanies the application. Its purpose is to reveal something of the applicant's preparation and insight. During their first months of work doctoral students often adjust their proposals in consultation with their advisors, who may also request a fuller .

• Ignorance: inexperienced researchers fail tounderstand the nature of a research proposal.

• Over-eagerness: in their haste to get on with thereal work, students slap together a poorly conceivedproposal. Problem•The ‘what’•Topic•AimsPlan•The ‘how’•Type•ApproachWhat does a proposal contain? 7. • Main problem• Key questions• HypothesesStatement• Delimitations of the study• Definitions and presuppositions• Preliminary literature reviewElucidation• The theological value• The practical valueValueThe ‘problem’ section 8.

• Type of study• Structure• TimeframeDesign• Data• Tools• StepsMethodology• Annotated reading listBibliographyThe ‘plan’ section 9. Take care with the preparation of your researchproposal.

Based on the proposal, your professor willmake a decision as to whether you are capable ofconducting serious research. Your proposal needs tomake a positive impression.

Sloppiness in thepresentation of your proposal sends the wrongmessage. No professor looks forward to working with alazy, careless student.

• Ensure your proposal conforms to institutionalrequirements.

THE PROBLEMHow does one develop a research idea into a researchproblem? 12.

Research idea• The research idea must be something of interest to you; theinterest must be intrinsic, not just extrinsic.

• The research idea may emerge from a real-life problem. • The research idea may come out of the current state ofresearch in a particular field. It may have theseed of a suitable research problem. • A preliminary literature review scans academic writingsrelated to your topic to see what has been done and whatquestions remain unanswered (or unasked). • A preliminary literature review will alert you to current trendsin your field of interest.

• A preliminary literature review will help you to delimit yourstudy to ensure that it is doable. • A preliminary literature review may alert you to the fact thatyour research idea is not doable.

Literature reviewSummariesAbstractsReviewsListingsBibliographiesOnline storesArticlesJournalsChaptersWholeSeminal booksTheses 16 We have designed this module to allow you to prepare either for their Masters dissertation or for application for a PhD, and in the process to gain experience in the construction of good research proposals. Starting with a vague initial idea about a possible project, you will be shown how progressively to refine that idea until .

How-to write a thesis (research) proposal | tryst with academia

beliefs, methods);• understand the research methods employed in your field;• have a good sense of what has been done, and wherethere are gaps in the current state of research; and• reach saturation point: when you are no longer findinganything new, it is a good indication that you have readenough.

Literature ReviewInsufficient or inadequate reading is one of the mostcommon causes of substandard research proposals. Students often rush to compile a proposal within anadequate reading programme.

Some universitiesrequire an extended reading programme before acandidate may even commence work on the researchproposal. Moral of the story: read, read, and read somemore.

• State the main research problem in a single sentence!• The form may be as a statement, question, or objective.

• The statement should have a subject and a complement.

• The problem should not permit a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer. • The question should not be a pretext for a crusade.

Main problemSingle sentenceIf you cannot state the mainproblem in one sentence, it isnot yet sufficiently clear inyour own mind!You must be able to state it inone sentence that contains allthe key elements, and pointsto the links between them. Problem or pretextYou are looking for a researchproblem.

While you should beinterested in your topic, youalso need to be objective.

How to write a research proposal | the school of divinity, history and

Keyquestion3Keyquestion2Keyquestion1Mainproblem4 6 Aug 2013 - Theological Research Seminary: Presentation 6. A research proposal “is a document that outlines how you propose to undertake your research studies” (Mouton 2001:44). • The research Over-eagerness: in their haste to get on with the real work, students slap together a poorly conceived proposal..

Key questionsSince the main problem is too large to treat as a whole, it isbroken down into 2-6 key questions in such a way that thesum of the key questions equals the main problem.

That is, ifyou answer all the key questions, you will have solved themain problem. How should churches in Swaziland minister topolygamous families which join the church?1. What culturalpractices related topolygamy posepastoral challengesto the churches?2.

How do thechurches currentlyhandle thesepastoralchallenges?3. What biblicalprinciples shouldpastors bear inmind as theyminister topolygamousfamilies?4.

What practicalsteps do churchesneed to take toenhance theirministry topolygamousfamilies? 22. Main problem• Question 1• Question 2• Question 3Thesis title• Chapter 2• Chapter 3• Chapter 44.

Key questionsThere is a direct correlation between the main problem and the thesistitle, and between the key questions and the chapters in the thesis body. Typically, the each key question governs a major chapter.

• Uncommon technicalterms• Terms with diversemeanings• Nuanced terms in yourstudy• Terms from otherdisciplines (e.

Flesh out proposalDelimitations Presuppositions• What you will not study, thatis, what you will exclude.

Appendix 1: sample research proposals - bcps

• The ‘givens’ which under-girdyour thinking and approach• Conclusions of previous researchon which you are building• Biblical, theological, orecclesiastical biases which mayinfluence your objectivity 25.

• Theoretical value: Describe how the proposed researchpromises to contribute to the current state of theologicalknowledge, and why its findings should be valuable In all cases, any applications to be reviewed by Research Committe should be received no later than one week before the meeting. Outcome of review. Depending on the Committee's judgement, an application will a) be approved for submission, alongside any feedback and suggestions on the proposal the reviewers have, .

• Practical value: Briefly describe the present realities and howthe proposed research may help to address them. – Who should benefit?– Why should they benefit?– How should they benefit?Fleshing out the proposal 26.

The plan needs to be thorough, describing every step theresearcher intends to take in solving the problem.

They set out the planin such vague, general terms that one really has no ideaexactly how the candidate intends to solve the problem.

The research plan should be presented in such detail andwith such clarity a different researcher, simply by studyingthe proposal, could duplicate the study. Research Design• The research design is the general approach you willuse to solve your research problem. • What kind of research must I undertake to solve theproblem, to achieve the objective?• The type and existence of the data you need to solvethe problem determine the design.

• Is there an existing research model that would servemy purposes well? 29. • Type– What type of data will I need to solve my problem?– Therefore, what type of study should I conduct?• Logic– How will the logic of the study unfold?– Which model seems most appropriate for the study?– How do I need to customize it for my study?Research Design 30.

• Timeframes– You need to assign due dates for each section. – The due dates become a contract with your supervisor.

• Guidelines for timeframes– Full-time: MTh = 1-1 years; PhD = 2-3 years– Part time: MTh = 2-3 years; PhD = 4-5 yearsResearch Design 31. Research MethodologyMethodologiesResearch methodologies areproven ways of solvingcertain problems. Anexpert researcher hasmastered the art of knowingwhen and how to employeach tool to solve problems.

Research applications | faculty of theology and religion

Drawingfrom your toolkit ofmethodologies, you willselect and use appropriatetools for each step 1 Jun 2002 - Appendix 1: Sample Research Proposals. All of the following research proposals are based on actual proposals submitted by ALM candidates. The original annotated bibliographies have been abridged in some cases to conserve space. Some notes on the main features of the first proposal, but relevant to .

Methodologies • Dialogical• Comparative• Complementary• Epistemological• Polemical• Analytical• SyntheticMethodologiesused primarily inconceptualargumentation 33. Methodologies • Textual criticism• Historical criticism• Lexical analysis• Syntactical analysis• Discourage analysis• Source criticism• Form criticism• Redaction criticismMethodologiesused primarily inbiblical exegesis 34.

Methodologies • Questionnaire• Survey• Interview• Case Study• Focus Group• Participant ObservationMethodologiesused primarily infield research 35. Research MethodologyYour MethodologyTake each step in theprocess and describeexactly how you planto do it.

The Main Components• Methods: Whatmethods will I use forthis component?• Materials: Whatmaterials will I use forthis component? 36. • We ask for an annotated bibliography at the end of theresearch proposal.

• You should not simply list books; you should know what is inthem and why they are relevant. • Only include scholarly sources which are directly relevant toyour research topic.

The common mistakes with the bibliography• out-dated works• popular works• irrelevant works• general worksBibliography 38.

BibliographyA word of advice—start compiling your thesisbibliography from day one! Each time you consult abook or an article, add it to your bibliography. Writingthe bibliography is frustrating at the best of times, butif you leave it to the end of the process, it can bealmost impossible.

We recommend that you open a fileon your computer called ‘Bibliography’ and update itevery time you find a new source.